why did jesus change levi to matthew

I. Many commentators compare Matthews two names with other first-century Jews who had a Greek or Latin cognomen. 135). [1] Regardless of how this name change is explained, this toll collector may have been trained in accounting and documenting records and may have been functionally bilingual or trilingual in order to converse with travellers moving between the territories of Philip and Antipas. CLICK HERE for Jesus and the Constant Crowds article. 1.31.124), see Joseph Barber Lightfoot, Essays on the Work Entitled Supernatural Religion: Reprinted from the Contemporary Review (London: Macmillan, 1893), 17077; Bacon, Studies in Matthew, 443-51; T. W. Manson, Studies in the Gospels and Epistles (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1962), 6975; Krzinger, Papias, 5051; France, Evangelist and Teacher, 58-60; Krtner, Papias, 15167; Gundry, Matthew, 617; Norelli, Papia, 5980; Gundry, Pre-Papian Tradition, 6467; Sim, R. This is very possible, as scholars point to Simon (Peter) and Saul. But Pilate replied, I imagine, "What happens in Jerusalem, stays in . One did not give up collecting taxes for the Romans on a whim and expect to ever return. 184.9-10) and Eusebius regarded the text as disputed but not unorthodox (h.e. Meier, The Vision of Matthew, 24; Luz, Matthew 820, 32, 32n.14. [45] Luomanen, Jewish-Christian Sects, 100101; Kok, Gospel according to the Hebrews, 41; Gregory, Gospel according to the Hebrews, 47, 47n.28. Christ redeemed the priesthood of Levi back unto himself and redeemed Matthew the . He was a tax collector who was sitting at his booth. Levi had to keep very accurate records. 3.27.4; 3.39.17; 4.22.8). R. McL. 3.27.4). [47] Whatever the case, Jerome slowly distanced himself from his earlier confident declarations that the Nazarenes had the original Matthean Gospel in their possession (cf. Biblical Evidence : Read Mark 2:13-14. Mark 3:18). [26], Krzingers and Gundrys proposals have varying degrees of persuasiveness, but most scholars have not been swayed by their contention that Papiass words on Matthew have been misread through the centuries. Vir. See Barnabas Lindars, Matthew, Levi, Lebbaeus and the Value of the Western Text, https://brentnongbri.com/2018/05/21/matthew-and-levi-and-james/, Lindars, Western Text,222; cf. Krzinger and Gundry insist that dialektos would be preceded by an article if a language was intended (cf. Teilband 1, ed. Luke, also, describes his calling: After this, Jesus went out and saw a tax collector by the name of Levi sitting at his tax booth. Matthew was obviously a small mokhes because he himself was sitting in the tax office as Jesus passed through the outskirts of Capernaum. The Pharisees asked them, Why does he eat with tax collectors and sinners? On hearing this, Jesus said to them, It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. See John P. Meier, The Vision of Matthew: Christ, Church, and Morality in the First Gospel(New York: Paulist, 1978), 2425. Alternatively, the textual variant that has James instead of Levi as the son of Alphaeus in Mark 2:14 in a handful of manuscripts was plausibly motivated by a desire for uniformity by having a single son of Alphaeus (cf. The other Eleven were ordinary men. It is beyond the scope of this paper to determine why Matthew was substituted for Levi. Levi - who the Bible tells us was also named Matthew - was a Jew and a tax collector. He had the ability, the means, the opportunity, the motivation, and he wouldnt have done it? [27] For instance, see Ulrich Krtner, Papias von Hierapolis: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des frhen Christentums, Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 133 (Gttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1983), 203206; Davies and Allison, Matthew IVII, 16; Black, Rhetorical Terminology, 3334, 38; France, Evangelist and Teacher, 57; Hagner, Matthew 113, xlv; Morris, Matthew, 1314; William R. Schoedel, Papias ANRW 2.27.1 (1993): 257, 263; Carson, Matthew, 13; Armin Baum, Ein aramischer Urmatthus im kleinasiatischen Gottesdienst. Among these repetitions are: variations of Mattathias (five times), Jesus (twice), Joseph (three times), Simeon (Semein), Levi (twice), and Melchi (twice). Perhaps most plain is the calling of the disciple Matthew, also known as Levi the tax collector. Impossible!"[3]. Jefferson himself believed that a person's religion was between them and their god. He was a man of moderate wealth, the only one of any means belonging to the apostolic corps. DepartmentBldg Tucson, AZ 85721 TEL 520-621-6897 FAX 520-626-9014. [10] For the debate over whether Mark 2:14 and 3:18 refer to the same individual or to two different individuals named Alphaeus, see Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses, 87n.17. A few scholars have likened Papiass oracles to a testimonium source or collection of prophetic proof-texts from the Hebrew Bible that were translated and integrated into the Gospel of Matthew. Hence, Eusebius corrected Irenaeus by substituting the Gospel according to the Hebrews as the Ebionitess preferred Gospel (h.e. Contrary to Epiphaniuss assertions, he may have not had access to the Gospel according to the Hebrews at all, and scholars generally label his source, which frequently harmonizes passages in the Synoptic Gospels, as the Gospel according to the Ebionites to distinguish it from the former text. They contend that the conjunction. [22] Krzinger, Papias, 22; Gundry, Matthew, 619; Pre-Papian Tradition, xxi, 68; cf. Additionally, specialists on the Synoptic Problem generally hold that Matthews Gospel reproduced over 90 percent of Marks content, improved Marks grammar and style, and edited out Marks transliterated Aramaic terms. James son of Alphaeus is traditionally identified as James the Less and James the brother of Jesus. Then Levi held a great banquet for Jesus at his house, and a large crowd of tax collectors and others were eating with them. Ps. 3.2-3), but failed to place them in a rhetorically effective arrangement (taxis), whereas Matthew arranged (sunetaxato) the oracles (logia) in a Hebrew style.[21] That is, they surmise that Matthew applied Jewish exegetical techniques and forms of argumentation to the material at his disposal to shape it into a cogent presentation about how Jesus fulfilled the Scriptures. [6] Tal Ilan, Lexicon of Jewish Names in Late Antiquity: Part I: Palestine 330 BCE 200 CE, TSAJ 91 (Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002). Jonah was in the belly of the whale 4 days. Mark 10:35) and swapped Salome for her in another (Matt 27:56; cf. The Gospel According to Matthew consequently emphasizes Christ's fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies (5:17) and his role as a new lawgiver whose divine mission was confirmed by repeated miracles. Matthew authored the first Gospel of the . [40] Conversely, Papias may not have known the Gospel according to the Hebrews at all, instead learning about the woman who was accused of many sins before the Lord from his oral informants in Asia Minor, and Eusebius may have been the one who discovered that this tale was included in the version of the Gospel according to the Hebrews that circulated in his own day. After his conversion, Matthew ardently preached Jesus as Messiah to his Jewish community. Matthew was a Levite from the priestly tribe of Levi, making his role that of writing on Christ's priesthood. For criticism of their theory, see France, Matthew, 70. 3.39.17. 3.2) that the Gospel according to the Hebrews was associated with Matthew. At worst, they were charlatans, sycophants, and brutes (cf. St. Matthew (Matthew 9:10) modestly says, "in the house," keeping himself as much as possible in the background.St. 2. 1. It would be psychologically impossible that such a man as Matthew, trained and experienced in writing records and reports he was a Roman official and such work was requisite for him since it went with the job would not have recorded things Jesus said. [4] See Manlio Simonetti, Matthew 113, ACCS New Testament 1a (Downers Grove: IVP, 2001), 177; Ulrich Luz, Matthew 820, trans. [42], It was not until Epiphanius (Pan. prol.) 2:1-10; Acts 8:9-24). Several theories have been offered to account for why the toll collector Levi was re-named Matthew in Matthew 9:9 (cf. [21] Krzinger, Papias, 1214, 2122, 5256; Gundry, Matthew, xxixxii, 61820; idem, Pre-Papian Tradition, 6364, 6768. H. Gundry, 291. Ward Powers enthusiastically endorses this line of reasoning in the following bold claim: "To have this evidence about the apostle Matthew his background, training, and employment in the Roman administration; his response to the call to follow Jesus; his appointment to the role and responsibility of apostle and to believe that he would. The Calling of Saint Matthew depicts the moment from Matthew 9:9 when Jesus passes by Matthew, a tax collector, and says 'Follow me.' Matthew (also called Levi) did so and became one of Jesus . He may call peop Matthew's " original name, Levi, suggests that he was a man of the priestly tribe." Levi means " adhesion ." But Matthew was re-Christened " gift " or "given," a profound switch for a tax. Tax collectors were hated by the Jews. [39] James R. Edwards has revived the older position that Matthew was the author of the Gospel according to the Hebrews and postulates that our Greek Gospel according to Matthew was named in honor of an apostolic figurehead who preserved the Jewish Jesus traditions. Teilband 1, ed. [17] W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison (A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Matthew's shocked facial expression shows that he understands this societal dynamic well, but his look and gesture may indicate even more than that. 40.9; Ezech. He offered something infinitely better. There is no indication that Matthew wrote anything (contra John 21:24; Gos. Jesus was becoming popular. Marys Perpetual Virginity & Jesus Brothers, Why Pollen on the Shroud of Turin Proves it is Real, Christian Inscriptions in Roman Catacombs, Eruption Of Mt. This article was most recently revised and updated by, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Matthew, McClintock and Strong Biblical Cyclopedia - Biography of Matthew, Catholic Online - Biography of St. Matthew, Catholic Information Network - St. Matthew Apostle and Evangelist. [2] For some examples, see Robert Gundry, The Use of the Old Testament in St. Matthews Gospel: With Special Reference to the Messianic Hope(Leiden: Brill, 1975), 183; David Hill, The Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972), 1; R. T. France, Matthew: Evangelist and Teacher (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989), 6768; Leon Morris, The Gospel according to Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992), 14; Donald A. Hagner, Matthew 113 (Dallas: Word, 1993), lxxvi; D. A. Carson, Matthew: Chapters 1 through 12 (EBC; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995), 1819; Grant R. Osbourne, Matthew, ECNT (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010), 34; B. in Mt. [33] For lexical discussion and debate about the term logion in Papiass vocabulary (cf. Follow me, Jesus told him, and Levi got up and followed him. 3.39.16). The text of Matthew in its final form, on the other hand, may be a better point of contrast for Marks narrative, and Q would not have an advantage over it if Q originated in Greek as well. Matthew was an accurate counter. Wilhelm Schneemelcher, trans. Jesus did not call us because of our righteousness or gifting. Fellow citizens considered him a social outcast who was a traitor to their nation. [18] B. C. Butler, The Originality of St Matthew: A Critique of the Two-Document Hypothesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951), 16566; Albright and Mann, Matthew, XXXVIXLVIII; Powers, Progressive Publication, 4749. Luke 6:12-26. Epiphanius added to the confusion when he imagined that the Gospel that he managed to get a hold of, which skips over the virgin birth and commences at Jesuss baptism (Pan. Numerous textual indications point to an author who was a Jewish Christian writing for Christians of similar background. Harris J. Rendel, The Logia and the Gospels, For lexical discussion and debate about the term. There is no evidence that any of the Patristic authorities made any inferences about Matthews proficiency in Greek or level of education in rhetorical composition based on Matthews former occupation alone. If Jesus proclaimed the 'Kingdom of God," sneered Pilate, let him die as "King of the Jews" (Mark 15:2,9,12,18,26). Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Christoph Markschies und Jens Schrter (Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck 2012), 6089; Kok, Gospel according to the Hebrews, 5253; Gregory, Gospel according to the Hebrews, 181. 20.5; Vir. They kept it for themselves and became very rich. Mark 16:1),[11] though this example differs slightly from Matthew 9:9 inasmuch as the woman is left unnamed. The Gospel of Mark at the beginning of this article is not the only Gospel which gives an account of the calling of the tax collector Levi aka Matthew. 16:18) Mark and Luke were probably stunned by Jesus inclusion of a hated tax collector in His Twelve. Jesus asked him to be a *disciple (Matthew 9:9). You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form. [18] Josef Krzinger and Robert Gundry have tried to line up Papiass testimony with the academic consensus. The fact that three of the four Gospels recount the calling by Jesus of the tax collector Levi is important. The Greek language became the international language through the conquests of Alexander the Great in 330 BCE.

Pangunahing Produkto Ng Bulacan, Famous British Female Impersonators, Quantum Vs Pseudo Randonautica, Columbia County Mugshots 2021, Flip This House Cast, Articles W

why did jesus change levi to matthew

why did jesus change levi to matthew

en_USEnglish