/s. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. Level 1. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. The virtual machine cannot boot. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . 4. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Not exactly. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM , Laptop based platform: # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . How to suppress iso files under specific directory . I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? You can change the type or just delete the partition. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. 3. Tried it yesterday. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. No bootfile found for UEFI! Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. You signed in with another tab or window. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. ElementaryOS boots just fine. Thanks a lot. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. they reviewed all the source code). @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK Well occasionally send you account related emails. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI Boots, but cannot find root device. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. I think it's OK. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. ? When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Getting the same error as @rderooy. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Thanks! VMware or VirtualBox) Sign in to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso Legacy? So any method that allows users to boot their media without having to explicitly disable Secure Boot can be seen as a nice thing to have even if it comes at the price of reducing the overall security of one's computer. My guesd is it does not. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. All the .efi files may not be booted. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. Yes ! Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? I checked and they don't work. Still having issues? This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. 1. Do I need a custom shim protocol? That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. Just some preliminary ideas. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . No bootfile found for UEFI! It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Hiren's BootCD Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. @steve6375 Okay thanks. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data.
ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi
English